Former film Mogul Harvey Weinstein was convicted of one of the main charges of retrial of a sex crime on Wednesday, but not guilty of another, but the ju-degree judge still failed to reach the verdict on his third charge.
The split verdict also gave his accusers, prosecutors, and Weinstein a measure of proof after the landmark case was thrown into Limbo.
Weinstein's first belief five years ago appeared to solidify the downfall of one of Hollywood's most powerful men at a moment of crucial importance to the #MeToo movement. However, the conviction was overturned last year, and the case was sent back for retrial in the same Manhattan court.
This time, a majority of female ju-search convicted the former studio boss in 2006 for forcing one woman, Miriam Haley, into criminal acts.
However, the ju judge acquitted Weinstein from accusations of another criminal act. This relates to Kaja Sokola, where the 2006 mandatory oral dating allegations were added to the case last year. And ju umpire continued to deliberate on Thursday accusations of raping another woman, Jessica Mann, in 2013. Under New York law, a third-degree rape claim carries a lower penalty than a crime of first-degree criminal activity.
Weinstein, 73, denied sexually assaulting or raping anyone.
Ju judges' deliberations were shaking Wednesday as Foreson again requested that the judge tell the judge about the “situation” he found troublesome.
The man complained that other ju-described urging people to change their minds and speak about information beyond the accusation, was personally questioned in response to his request.
The ju judge was in court to hear the answer to his previous request to rehear the rape law text, but the foreperson signaled Judge Curtis Farber what he wanted to talk about.
Breaking the national news
For news that affects Canada and the world, sign up to break news alerts delivered directly when they occur.
“He said the words about the effect of 'You can't get back there with other ju umpires,” Farber explained later. The foreperson was sent to wait in another room, where he wrote a note saying, “I need to tell you about the situation.”
When he was taken to court for a moment, the foreperson said he wanted to talk to him privately. He, the judge, the prosecutor and Weinstein's lawyers then went behind the closed door.
Entertainment details more videos
The debate was closed to the press and the public, but Farber later said that the foreperson had expressed that he did not want to change his position.
“He showed that at least one other ju umpire commented on the effect of 'someday I'll see you.' And then there are screams and screams,” the judge said.
Weinstein's lawyer Arthur Adara said he was more serious about Forisson's concerns, saying he was worried about his safety after a fellow panelist spoke about meeting him and added, “You don't know me.”
Trend now
NS woman wrongly diagnosed with terminal cancer: “Absolutely devastating”
These real estate markets may show signs of life, the report suggests
“I don't think the court is protecting this ju apprentice for a period,” Adara said.
But prosecutor Matthew Colangelo said the previous artisans were not afraid or anxious about being just “stubborn.”
“He said he made up his mind and didn't want to change it and people were putting pressure on him to change it. That's what's involved in the ju judge's deliberation,” the prosecutor said.
This episode was the latest indication of tension among the ju umpire. On Friday, one of them asked to make excuses as they felt another member of the group was being treated unfairly.
Weinstein's lawyers then failed the misconduct and asked again after Forisson expressed concern on Monday. The ry umpire continued deliberation and passed on Tuesday without sending any further messages about interpersonal tensions.
Seven women and five male ju apprentices began their fifth day of deliberation on Wednesday by rehearing the testimony of accused Jessica Mann of raping her in a Manhattan hotel room in 2013. The group concluded Tuesday's deliberations calling for a revisited testimony.
Some appeared to be taking new notes on Wednesday, while other ju umpires sat cautiously as court stenographers read the requested portion of Mann's days of testimony aloud. The ry umpire had already rehearsed several sections last week.
Weinstein, 73, pleaded not guilty to raping Mann and forcing two other women, Mimi Haley and Kaja Sokora to oral sex. The Oscar-winning producer and former Hollywood powerbroker claimed that no one had sexually assaulted or raped, and his lawyer portrayed his accuser as an opportunist who embraced his progress because he wanted to lift his foot in the entertainment world.
Curator Recommendations
The best bug repellent to take a bite of you this summer
Summer picks for your next boat, beach, and cabin escape
& Copy 2025 Canada Report